Market  ·  Archive · past issue

Dogecoin Mining & Fee Market Update — September 21–27, 2026

1. The week on the tape

DOGE closed the week at $0.0969, up 11.0% (Sep 27 vs Sep 20), with the week's high at $0.10589 (Sep 22) and its low at $0.08723 (Sep 21). The shape was a squeeze and a fade: roughly $12.7 million of short liquidations drove a two-session spike to the first daily close above $0.10 in our records, then a 7.7% Wednesday fade returned most of it. For miners, the week was a raise they did nothing to earn: the DOGE-denominated subsidy is fixed, so an 11% price move lifted the dollar value of every block by almost exactly 11%, from ~$1.19M to ~$1.32M per day across the network. It is worth restating plainly, as every edition does: a miner's dollar revenue this week moved with price, not with fees, not with usage.

The close also reset the nine-week frame: $0.0969 is the highest weekly close in our window (above W34's $0.0934), and together with W38's +6.0% it ends the up-down-up-down alternation that ran from W34 through W38 — the first back-to-back up week on record. For a miner the macro point is unchanged, though: the subsidy's dollar value rose because price did, not because anything in the mining model moved.

2. Hashrate and difficulty

The security layer was steady through the storm. Hashrate printed at 3.83 PH/s (24-hour average, Blockchair) and difficulty retargeted up 0.4% to 56,109,335 from 55,873,021 — the first upward retarget after last week's 2.5% easing, and the two series moved in lockstep (+0.42% each on unrounded values), as they must. The chain's clock ran close to design: the week averaged about 1,360 blocks per day, an implied block time near 63.5 seconds against the 60-second target. An 11% price week that produces a 0.4% hash response is the merge-mining reality: hash committed to Dogecoin follows combined LTC+DOGE economics, not DOGE sentiment, and it moves far more slowly than the tape.

One sourcing caveat we repeat every week because it matters: cross-provider hashrate estimates for Dogecoin differ materially because of merge-mining attribution, so we quote a single labelled snapshot (Blockchair) rather than blending sources into a number we cannot reproduce. The w/w comparison uses the same source on both sides.

3. Miner revenue: the subsidy math

Gross miner revenue ran at approximately $1.32M per day, essentially all of it block subsidy: about 13.60M DOGE issued daily (1,360 observed blocks × 10,000 DOGE), worth that amount at the $0.0969 weekly close. The design behind the number defines everything else in this report. Dogecoin issues roughly 4.96 billion DOGE per year — about 3.18% supply inflation against 156.10B outstanding — with no maximum supply and no halvings. Annualized, the subsidy is worth on the order of $481M at the weekly close, up from $434M last week on price alone.

Subsidy lineThis weekPrior week
Weekly close$0.0969$0.08731
Daily issuance13.60M DOGE13.62M DOGE
Issuance value/day~$1.32M~$1.19M
Annualized issuance~4.96B DOGE ≈ $481M~4.97B DOGE ≈ $434M
Supply inflation~3.18%~3.19%

4. The fee ledger

Fees remain a footnote — deliberately. The median transaction fee printed at 0.0707 DOGE, about $0.0068, up 19.9% from last week's 0.0590 DOGE. At ~24,106 transactions per day, aggregate fee income to miners is on the order of $165 per day — roughly 0.013% of subsidy revenue. There was no congestion event: the mempool held 845 transactions and 191 KB at the snapshot, against 824 and 185 KB last week. As with the prior jump, we treat a single median print without mempool pressure as transaction-mix noise, not a fee-market shift — though two elevated prints in three weeks is now a series worth watching rather than a coincidence to dismiss.

Ledger lineValue
Median fee per transfer0.0707 DOGE (~$0.0068)
Daily transactions (Sep 21–27 avg)24,106
Estimated miner fee income/day~$165
Subsidy revenue/day~$1,320,000
Fee share of revenue~0.013%
Mempool at snapshot845 tx / 191 KB

5. Revenue per unit of hashrate

Miners compete for a fixed daily reward, so the number that actually describes mining economics is revenue per unit of hash. Take the week's $1.32M of daily issuance and divide it by the 3.83 PH/s securing the chain: roughly $345,000 of subsidy revenue per PH/s per day, or about $126M per PH/s annualised at the September 27 close — up from $312,000 and $114M last week, a 10.8% raise delivered entirely by price while the hash denominator moved 0.4%. That is the pool every operator is competing for.

Mining economics lineThis weekHow it is derived
Network hashrate3.83 PH/s (24h avg)Blockchair snapshot, Sep 28
Daily issuance13.60M DOGE ≈ $1.32M1,360 observed blocks × 10,000 DOGE × close
Subsidy per PH/s~$345,000/dayDaily issuance value ÷ network hashrate
Annualised per PH/s~$126MSubsidy per PH/s × 365
Annualised network subsidy~$481MDaily issuance value × 365
Fee contribution~$165/dayMedian fee × daily transactions, in USD

The standing warnings apply. Hashrate is a stock, not a flow: this read is a 24-hour average, so the per-PH/s figure moves with a single day's estimate. And because the reward is fixed in DOGE while hash is shared with Litecoin, the per-PH/s pool compresses the moment new hash arrives — which is why a price rally with flat hash, like this week's, is the best week of the year for the operators who stayed.

6. The subsidy clock: 1,360 of a nominal 1,440

The quietest source of error in Dogecoin miner math gets its standing section. The network is designed to produce 1,440 blocks a day — one every 60 seconds — which would mean exactly 14.40M DOGE of daily issuance. The chain actually produced 1,360 blocks a day across September 21–27, or 13.60M DOGE: 94.4% of the nominal subsidy, with an implied block time of 63.5 seconds.

None of that is a malfunction. Proof-of-work block discovery is a random process with a target, and difficulty is what pulls the long-run average back to 60 seconds — this week's +0.4% retarget is that mechanism working after last week's −2.5%. But it does mean anyone quoting the theoretical 14.40M DOGE a day is overstating miner revenue by about 5.5% before choosing a price. We quote the observed block count because it is the number the chain actually paid, and the supply series confirms it to the coin: 9,523 blocks × 10,000 = exactly the 95.23M DOGE added this week.

7. What stays removed: the pool table

The pool-share table remains removed, for the same reason given when it was pulled: we cannot verify pool hash distribution from a source we trust at the time of writing, and an estimated table we cannot reproduce fails this site's standard. Rather than substitute a different guess, we publish the gap. If a verifiable pool-share source returns, the table returns with it. The structural point stands without percentages: Dogecoin is merge-mined with Litecoin, so its security pool is shared, and concentration among a few large operators remains the known structural risk to watch — a fact we will quantify the day we can source it.

8. What a DOGE fee buys — and the cheaper rail

Dollar for dollar, Dogecoin remains one of the cheapest transfers in crypto: a median fee of about $0.0068 to move value in roughly a minute. The honest comparison for stablecoin movers is against TRON, where a USDT transfer costs about $0.20 in TRX bandwidth when paid directly — or about $0.02 using rented energy:

TransferTypical cost
DOGE transfer (median fee)~$0.0068
TRON USDT transfer, direct bandwidth~$0.20 (1.05 TRX)
TRON USDT transfer, rented energy~$0.02 (0.12 TRX)

That roughly 90% saving on TRON is the entire proposition behind Tronsell's energy rental — same transfer, same finality, a fraction of the cost. We publish the comparison because a fee report that only quotes one chain is marketing, not data.

9. Week 39 miner scorecard

SignalReadingVerdict
Hashrate3.83 PH/s, 24h avgHeld; +0.4% w/w
Difficulty56,109,335 (+0.4% w/w)Routine upward retarget
Chain clock~63.5s avg; 1,360 blocks/dayClose to target
Subsidy revenue~$1.32M/day (13.60M DOGE)Price-led, structurally stable
Fee income~$165/day (~0.013% of revenue)Footnote, by design; series worth watching
Pool shareNot publishedNo verifiable source

10. Outlook: three dated markers

October 14: BWOW ceases trading, shrinking the DOGE ETF complex from three funds to two — a mechanical, dated change with a mining-side footnote: if the record $2.89M flow week partly reflected positioning ahead of that delisting, the post-October-14 flow series is the clean read. Fourth quarter 2026: the Federal Reserve has two meetings left and a dot plot implying one more hike; a second hike is the likeliest macro test of the new $0.09–$0.10 range. The next difficulty retarget: after this week's +0.4%, the question is whether hash follows price upward — DOGE per PH/s is the same as last week's by construction, but if hash arrives while price stalls, the per-PH/s pool compresses. We will report the number, not the mood.

One forward-looking framing from coverage worth logging for later grading: CoinMarketCap's community analysis noted this week that daily issuance ($1.32M) still exceeds the ETF complex's best single day ($1.17M). That ratio — new supply versus the demand line the funds represent — is checkable every week, and this week it read: supply wins.

Frequently asked questions

Why is there still no pool-share table?
Because we could not verify pool hash distribution from a source we trust when writing this edition, and we do not publish estimates we cannot reproduce. We would rather show the gap than a plausible number. The structural risk — concentration among a few large merge-mining operators — is unchanged.
Why did difficulty rise this week?
It retargeted up about 0.4% to 56,109,335, reversing last week's 2.5% easing. Difficulty is the mechanism that pulls the chain's block time back toward 60 seconds, and with the clock averaging 63.5 seconds, a small upward nudge is the mechanism working. Hashrate itself held at 3.83 PH/s — an 11% price week barely moved it, which is normal for merge-mined hash that follows combined LTC+DOGE economics.
Did the median fee rise mean anything?
Not yet, but it is now a series rather than a print. The median rose 19.9% to 0.0707 DOGE with the mempool essentially unchanged (845 transactions / 191 KB vs 824 / 185 KB) — the same shape as the prior week's jump, which we called noise. Two elevated prints in three weeks without congestion is transaction-mix drift, not a fee market; the threshold we watch is sustained median growth with a filling mempool.
What does 3.18% annual inflation mean for miners?
It is the revenue engine. Roughly 4.96 billion new DOGE per year, worth about $481M annually at the September 27 close, flows to miners regardless of usage or fees. It also means miners' dollar revenue moves almost one-for-one with price — this week the close rose 11.0% and daily subsidy value rose 10.8%, while the DOGE-denominated issuance actually fell 0.1%.
How do you compute miner revenue?
From the observed block count and the 10,000 DOGE block subsidy: the week averaged 1,360 blocks per day, giving 13.60M DOGE issued daily, valued at the weekly close. We quote the observed figure rather than the nominal 1,440-block schedule because actual daily issuance varies with block count, and we label the price used.
What is revenue per PH/s and why does it matter?
It is the daily subsidy pool divided by network hashrate. This week that is about $345,000 per PH/s per day, or roughly $126M annualised per PH/s — up from $312,000 and $114M last week, a raise delivered entirely by price while hash moved 0.4%. Because the reward is fixed in DOGE and the pool is shared, every additional unit of hash lowers everyone's share — which is why hashrate competition, not fee markets, drives DOGE mining economics.
Why do you use 13.60M DOGE a day instead of the 14.40M schedule?
Because the chain did not produce 1,440 blocks a day this week — it produced 1,360, about 94.4% of the nominal schedule at an average block time of 63.5 seconds. Quoting the theoretical figure would overstate miner revenue by roughly 5.5% before any price assumption. We use the observed block count and label the derivation; the supply series confirms it to the coin.
Keep USDT transfers close to zero
Rent TRON energy and cut stablecoin transfer costs by 60–90%. Data, not hype — see how the numbers compare.
Compare on Tronsell